Comp Titles: How to Choose Them (And Why Most Writers Get It Wrong)
Comparable titles are one of the most misunderstood parts of a query. Here's what agents actually mean when they ask for them.
Comp titles (comparable titles, sometimes called "comparables") are the books or authors you name in your query to help an agent place your work in the market. They're also one of the most misunderstood elements of a query — and getting them wrong can undercut an otherwise strong submission.
What agents are actually asking when they request comp titles
Agents aren't asking you to name books that are similar to yours in plot. They're asking you to demonstrate:
- That you read in your genre and know the current market
- That there's an established readership for what you've written
- That your book has a recognisable shelf position
A comp title is a market signal, not a literary comparison.
The recency rule
Most agents want comp titles published within the last 2–4 years. This isn't arbitrary — they need to know where your book fits in the current market, and they use recent titles to estimate what advance and deal structure might look like.
Comping to a book published in 2010 tells an agent almost nothing useful. Comping to a 2023 debut that sold well in your genre tells them a great deal.
The "too big" problem
The most common comping mistake is reaching too high. Naming Gone Girl, The Girl on the Train, or The Handmaid's Tale as a comp tells an agent that either:
- You haven't read your genre recently enough to name contemporary titles
- You believe your book is in a different league from published mid-list fiction
Neither impression helps you. Agents and publishers are not buying your book because it's "the next Gone Girl." They're buying it because it's positioned in a market where readers of that kind of book will find it.
Exception: You can comp to a classic or breakout title if you pair it with a recent title. "For readers of Tana French and [2024 debut crime novel]" signals awareness of both the tradition and the current market.
The "too niche" problem
The opposite mistake: comping to a book so obscure that no one in the submission chain has heard of it. If an agent, their colleague, and a publisher's acquiring editor can't place the title, the comp does nothing.
Aim for books that were reviewed in major outlets or won prizes in their category, even if they weren't bestsellers.
Format options that work
- Title + Author: Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn — straightforward, useful
- Two titles combined: For readers of Sally Rooney and Rachel Cusk — strong when the pairing captures your tonal range
- X meets Y: Fleabag meets Normal People — works best for voice-driven literary fiction; use carefully in commercial genres
- Title + qualifier: The Secret History, but set in present-day Edinburgh — useful when the setting or contemporary angle is the key differentiator
Where to find good comp titles
- Publisher's Marketplace deal announcements in your genre
- The acknowledgements sections of recently published books in your category
- "Readers also enjoyed" lists on Goodreads and retail pages for books similar to yours
- Debut author interviews in trade publications (Publishers Weekly, Booklist)
How many comp titles to include
Two to three is standard. One may feel thin; four or more starts to look like you're hedging. Two well-chosen titles are better than four mediocre ones.
Ready to put this into practice?
QueryCheck analyses your manuscript details against thousands of real agent critiques and gives you a diagnosis grounded in what actually gets requests.
get your free diagnosis